Old “remote://“ protocol is hard coded RemoteDomainConnectionService

Email conversation on wildfly-dev:

http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/2014-May/002157.html

> 1). Why the following entry is still referring to 9999 ? Shouldn't it be 9990 ?
>
> <domain-controller>
> <remote host="10.211.55.7" port="9999"/>
> </domain-controller>
>
> FTR it only works with 9999, not with 9990.
>
> Domain Controller shows the message:
>
> [Host Controller] 15:36:22,811 INFO [org.jboss.as.domain] (Host
> Controller Service Threads - 28) JBAS010918: Registered remote slave
> host "slave", WildFly 8.1.0.CR2 “Kenny”
It looks like we hardcode the old “remote://“ protocol in RemoteDomainConnectionService rather than the new http-remoting protocol, so it is a bug. I am not sure if that is something we should attempt to negotiate explicitly, or to make the <remote> element take a ‘protocol’ attribute?