Hi there, during our comparison check with RPMs distro, we noticed some artifacts that may have wrong license configured on ZIP side. Here is the list:

# Artefact-name:::rpm-package-name:::zip-license:::rpm-license

saaj-impl:::eap8-saaj-impl:::CDDL-1.1 or GPLv2 with exceptions:::BSD
parsson:::eap8-parsson:::BSD or GPLv2 with exceptions:::EPL-2.0
expressly:::eap8-expressly:::Public Domain:::EPL-2.0
jboss-saaj-api_3.0_spec:::eap8-jboss-saaj-api_3.0_spec:::EPL-2.0 or GPLv2 with exceptions:::BSD
jsf-impl:::eap8-jsf-impl:::CDDL-1.1 or GPLv2 with exceptions:::EPL-2.0

Names in above excerpt are abbreviated based on this.

• saaj-impl is assigned with license Common Development and Distribution License 1.1 or GNU General Public License v2.0 only, with Classpath exception
  • should be Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0 based on this
• parsson is assigned with license Eclipse Distribution License, Version 1.0 or GNU General Public License v2.0 only, with Classpath exception
  • should be EPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0 WITH Classpath-exception-2.0 based on this
• expressly is assigned with license Public Domain
  • should be EPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0 WITH Classpath-exception-2.0 based on this
• jboss-saaj-api_3.0_spec is assigned with license {{Eclipse Public License 2.0
  GNU General Public License v2.0 only, with Classpath exception}}
  • should be Eclipse Distribution License - v 1.0 based on this
  • note: TBH we are using jboss-saaj-api_3.0_spec artifact which I didn't find publicly, hopefully the license hasn't changed...
• jsf-impl is assigned with license Common Development and Distribution License 1.1 and GNU General Public License v2.0 only, with Classpath exception
  • should be EPL-2.0 based on info from JBEAP-24606

Could you please check? I may be also using wrong source of truth too... not quite sure.