Uploaded image for project: 'AMQ Broker'
  1. AMQ Broker
  2. ENTMQBR-3120

Transaction rollback ordering is broken with AMQP

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • +
    • ARTEMIS-2458
    • Verified in a release
    • Hide

      Attached is the test case class,
      Copy the below into the following location of artemis source

      \integration-tests\src\test\java\org\apache\activemq\artemis\tests\integration\amqp

      Show
      Attached is the test case class, Copy the below into the following location of artemis source \integration-tests\src\test\java\org\apache\activemq\artemis\tests\integration\amqp

    Description

      When rolling back the message order is corrupted.

      The issue is able to easily recreate using QPID's own Test suite, but pointing it at Artemis (AMQ7) instead of ActivMQ 5
      test in question that passes when pointing to ActiveMQ5, but fails and re-creates the ordering issue seen.

      org.apache.qpid.jms.transactions.JmsTransactedConsumerTest.testReceiveSomeThenRollback

activemq5: passes
artemis: fails - java.lang.AssertionError: Unexpected order of messages: [5, 4, 3, 1, 2]

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          clones

          Bug - A problem that impairs or prevents the functions of the product. ENTMQBR-2707 Transaction rollback ordering is broken with AMQP

          • Major - To be worked after higher priority work items are addressed. When the severity is high and the effort to change it is low to moderate, this term is chosen. Issues in this category likely have an existing workaround but implementation or execution may be non-trivial.
          • Closed
          is duplicated by

          Bug - A problem that impairs or prevents the functions of the product. ENTMQBR-3093 Cancelling pre-fetch buffer will break ordering with AMQP

          • Major - To be worked after higher priority work items are addressed. When the severity is high and the effort to change it is low to moderate, this term is chosen. Issues in this category likely have an existing workaround but implementation or execution may be non-trivial.
          • Closed

          Activity

            People

              csuconic@redhat.com Clebert Suconic
              dbruscin Domenico Francesco Bruscino
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: