Uploaded image for project: 'CDI Specification Issues'
  1. CDI Specification Issues
  2. CDI-62

Clarify @Resource/@PersistenceContext/etc. on disabled alternatives

    • Icon: Tracker Tracker
    • Resolution: Obsolete
    • Icon: Major Major
    • TBD
    • 1.0
    • Java EE integration
    • None

      Is it expected that the container validates these dependencies and fails deployment if they don't exist? I think it is, right? At least, I think some containers behave this way. Then we should say that this validation should not happen if the annotation appears in a class annotated @Alternative. I have no idea what the right language would be...

            [CDI-62] Clarify @Resource/@PersistenceContext/etc. on disabled alternatives

            The CDI project is part ofJakarta and uses GitHub issues as it's issue tracking system.
            Therefore, all issues in CDI JIRA project are being bulk-closed as described in this GitHub issue.

            If you feel like this particular issue deserves ongoing discussion, investigation or fixes in CDI/CDI TCK, please create a new issue under GitHub repository and include a link to this JIRA.

            For specification related question/issues, please use - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/cdi/issues
            For CDI TCK related questions/issues, please use - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/cdi-tck/issues

            Matěj Novotný added a comment - The CDI project is part ofJakarta and uses GitHub issues as it's issue tracking system. Therefore, all issues in CDI JIRA project are being bulk-closed as described in this GitHub issue . If you feel like this particular issue deserves ongoing discussion, investigation or fixes in CDI/CDI TCK, please create a new issue under GitHub repository and include a link to this JIRA. For specification related question/issues, please use - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/cdi/issues For CDI TCK related questions/issues, please use - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/cdi-tck/issues

            This is governed by the Java EE spec

            Pete Muir (Inactive) added a comment - This is governed by the Java EE spec

              Unassigned Unassigned
              pmuiratbleepbleep Pete Muir (Inactive)
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: