-
Feature Request
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
None
-
None
At the moment all tests must run with
@RunWith(Arquillian.class)
This makes trouble if you need a runner with add or remove tests like Parameterized. I can't see what Arquillian.class do which can not be done with a JUnit-Rule. JUnit-Rules can be easily combined.
[ARQ-1828] Replace Testrunner with a JUnit-Rule
Moinz Moinzen (Inactive)
added a comment - A Junit Rule would also make it a lot easier to make some default setup, and then allowing the individual tests to add further information.
Example:
private static class MyTestRule implements TestRule { ArquillianTestRule arquillianTestRule = new ArquillianTestRule(); private final WebArchive warModule = ShrinkWrap.create(WebArchive.class, "test.war") .addPackages(true, "some.default.package") .addAsManifestResource("MANIFEST.MF") .addAsWebResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml") .addClass(ServerUserContext.class); private final JavaArchive beansModule = ShrinkWrap.create(JavaArchive.class).addClass(ApiProducer.class); public void addWarClass(Class clazz) { warModule.addClass(clazz); } @Override public Statement apply(Statement base, Description description) { arquillianTestRule.setArchive(ShrinkWrap.create(EnterpriseArchive.class, "test.ear") .addAsModule(warModule) .addAsModule(beansModule)); return arquillianTestRule.apply(base, description); } }
Usage:
public class MyTest { @Rule MyTestRule rule = new MyTestRule(); @Setup public void setup(){ rule.addWarClass(MyOtherClass.class); } @Test public void myTest() { //Go! } }
Moinz Moinzen (Inactive)
added a comment - A Junit Rule would also make it a lot easier to make some default setup, and then allowing the individual tests to add further information.
Example:
private static class MyTestRule implements TestRule {
ArquillianTestRule arquillianTestRule = new ArquillianTestRule();
private final WebArchive warModule = ShrinkWrap.create(WebArchive.class, "test.war" )
.addPackages( true , "some. default . package " )
.addAsManifestResource( "MANIFEST.MF" )
.addAsWebResource(EmptyAsset.INSTANCE, "beans.xml" )
.addClass(ServerUserContext.class);
private final JavaArchive beansModule = ShrinkWrap.create(JavaArchive.class).addClass(ApiProducer.class);
public void addWarClass( Class clazz) {
warModule.addClass(clazz);
}
@Override
public Statement apply(Statement base, Description description) {
arquillianTestRule.setArchive(ShrinkWrap.create(EnterpriseArchive.class, "test.ear" )
.addAsModule(warModule)
.addAsModule(beansModule));
return arquillianTestRule.apply(base, description);
}
}
Usage:
public class MyTest {
@Rule
MyTestRule rule = new MyTestRule();
@Setup
public void setup(){
rule.addWarClass(MyOtherClass.class);
}
@Test
public void myTest() {
//Go!
}
}
We haven't replaced it but shipped rules as an alternative to the runner. 1.2.0.Final should hit Maven Central pretty soon.
You can read all about it here http://arquillian.org/arquillian-core/#_rules