Uploaded image for project: 'WildFly'
  1. WildFly
  2. WFLY-7566

connections-per-thread description and default value

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • User Experience

    Description

      Description for /subsystem=undertow/configuration=filter/mod-cluster=load-balancer[connections-per-thread]

                  "connections-per-thread" => {
                      "type" => INT,
                      "description" => "The number of connections that will be maintained to backend servers, per IO thread. Defaults to 10.",
                      "expressions-allowed" => true,
                      "nillable" => true,
                      "default" => 40,
                      "access-type" => "read-write",
                      "storage" => "configuration",
                      "restart-required" => "no-services"
                  },
      

      and for /profile=load-balancer/subsystem=undertow/configuration=handler/reverse-proxy=my-rev-proxy[connections-per-thread]

                  "connections-per-thread" => {
                      "type" => INT,
                      "description" => "The number of connections that will be maintained to backend servers, per IO thread. Defaults to 10.",
                      "expressions-allowed" => true,
                      "nillable" => true,
                      "default" => 10,
                      "access-type" => "read-write",
                      "storage" => "configuration",
                      "restart-required" => "no-services"
                  },
      

      I can see one or maybe two problems there:

      1. Description for connections-per-thread in mod-cluster element is wrong as it does not reflect reality as it says that default value for that attribute is 10, but in fact default value there is 40. Maybe we should just remove information about default value from the description completely?
      2. Is not actually wrong that those two attributes have different default value as they basically reffer to the same thing althgouth one in the mod-cluster and second in the reverse-proxy?

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              sdouglas1@redhat.com Stuart Douglas
              sdouglas1@redhat.com Stuart Douglas
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: