Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
3.0.10.Final, 7.0.0.Final
-
None
Description
When adding mixed domain tests for EAP 7.1.0 I could not get the MixedDomainDeployment710TestCase.testExplodedDeployment() test to work. Comparing with the core domain ExplodedDeploymentTestCase.testInstallAndExplodeDeploymentOnDCFromScratch(), they both do the following:
1) Create an empty deployment 2) Add some content to the deployment using input streams 3) Add the deployment to a server group
However, they differ in that ExplodedDeploymentTestCase does this as individual steps, while MixedDomainDeployment710TestCase does this in a composite. I have a branch at https://github.com/kabir/wildfly-core/tree/WFCORE-3479 which expands ExplodedDeploymentTestCase to demonstrate the problem.
Going back to MixedDomainDeploymentTestCase, the testExplodedDeployment() test pushes the following composite to the DC:
{
"operation" => "composite",
"address" => [],
"steps" => [
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [("deployment" => "test.war")],
"content" => [{"empty" => true}]
},
{
"operation" => "add-content",
"address" => [("deployment" => "test.war")],
"content" => [
{
"target-path" => "index.html",
"input-stream-index" => 0
},
{
"target-path" => "index2.html",
"input-stream-index" => 1
}
]
},
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [
("server-group" => "other-server-group"),
("deployment" => "test.war")
],
"enabled" => true
},
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [
("server-group" => "main-server-group"),
("deployment" => "test.war")
],
"enabled" => true
}
],
"operation-headers" => {
"caller-type" => "user",
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "b016e0a3-4175-4f40-b6b9-779fc0fd1745",
"execute-for-coordinator" => true
}
}
What ends up being pushed to the slave is:
{
"operation" => "composite",
"address" => [],
"steps" => [
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [("deployment" => "test.war")],
"content" => [{
"hash" => bytes {
0x8f, 0x7c, 0x8c, 0x80, 0x35, 0x88, 0x36, 0x16,
0x61, 0xfa, 0x0a, 0x10, 0x30, 0xf9, 0x13, 0x29,
0x04, 0x05, 0x9d, 0x82
},
"archive" => false
}],
"operation-headers" => {
"caller-type" => "user",
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "9f6d874e-24f8-41ec-a1d0-9c98509964fc"
},
"runtime-name" => undefined
},
{
"operation" => "add-content",
"address" => [("deployment" => "test.war")],
"content" => [{
"hash" => bytes {
0x52, 0x3a, 0x0a, 0x7b, 0x3b, 0xae, 0x1c, 0x67,
0x22, 0x51, 0xf6, 0x34, 0xb5, 0x3b, 0xe7, 0xf9,
0x78, 0x59, 0x91, 0x63
},
"target-path" => "."
}],
"operation-headers" => {
"caller-type" => "user",
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "9f6d874e-24f8-41ec-a1d0-9c98509964fc"
},
"path" => [
"index.html",
"index2.html"
]
},
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [
("server-group" => "other-server-group"),
("deployment" => "test.war")
],
"enabled" => true
},
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [
("server-group" => "main-server-group"),
("deployment" => "test.war")
],
"enabled" => true
}
],
"operation-headers" => {
"caller-type" => "user",
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "9f6d874e-24f8-41ec-a1d0-9c98509964fc",
"execute-for-coordinator" => true
}
}
The error reported by the DC is:
{
"outcome" => "failed",
"result" => {
"step-1" => {
"outcome" => "failed",
"rolled-back" => true
},
"step-2" => {
"outcome" => "failed",
"rolled-back" => true
},
"step-3" => {
"outcome" => "failed",
"rolled-back" => true
},
"step-4" => {
"outcome" => "failed",
"rolled-back" => true
}
},
"failure-description" => {"WFLYDC0074: Operation failed or was rolled back on all servers. Server failures:" => {"server-group" => {"other-server-group" => {"host" => {"slave" => {"server-one" => {"WFLYCTL0062: Composite operation failed and was rolled back. Steps that failed:" => {"Operation step-1" => "WFLYCTL0216: Management resource '[(\"deployment\" => \"test.war\")]' not found"}}}}}}}},
"rolled-back" => true,
"server-groups" => {"other-server-group" => {"host" => {"slave" => {"server-one" => {"response" => {
"outcome" => "failed",
"result" => {
"step-1" => {
"outcome" => "failed",
"failure-description" => "WFLYCTL0216: Management resource '[(\"deployment\" => \"test.war\")]' not found",
"rolled-back" => true
},
"step-2" => {"outcome" => undefined}
},
"failure-description" => {"WFLYCTL0062: Composite operation failed and was rolled back. Steps that failed:" => {"Operation step-1" => "WFLYCTL0216: Management resource '[(\"deployment\" => \"test.war\")]' not found"}},
"rolled-back" => true
}}}}}}
}
Having debugged the slave process a bit, I believe the following is what is passed to the servers by the slave HC:
{
"operation" => "composite",
"steps" => [
{
"operation" => "add-content",
"address" => [("deployment" => "test.war")],
"content" => [{
"hash" => bytes {
0x52, 0x3a, 0x0a, 0x7b, 0x3b, 0xae, 0x1c, 0x67,
0x22, 0x51, 0xf6, 0x34, 0xb5, 0x3b, 0xe7, 0xf9,
0x78, 0x59, 0x91, 0x63
},
"target-path" => "."
}],
"operation-headers" => {
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "2bd6c01d-a844-43fc-8d10-7d6e4c32e5b1"
},
"path" => [
"index.html",
"index2.html"
]
},
{
"operation" => "add",
"address" => [("deployment" => "test.war")],
"enabled" => true,
"operation-headers" => {
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "2bd6c01d-a844-43fc-8d10-7d6e4c32e5b1"
},
"runtime-name" => "test.war",
"content" => [{
"hash" => bytes {
0x52, 0x3a, 0x0a, 0x7b, 0x3b, 0xae, 0x1c, 0x67,
0x22, 0x51, 0xf6, 0x34, 0xb5, 0x3b, 0xe7, 0xf9,
0x78, 0x59, 0x91, 0x63
},
"archive" => false
}]
}
],
"operation-headers" => {
"access-mechanism" => "NATIVE",
"domain-uuid" => "2bd6c01d-a844-43fc-8d10-7d6e4c32e5b1"
},
"address" => []
}
Note that 'add-content' now comes BEFORE 'add', which would explain the "Management resource '[(\"deployment\" => \"test.war\")]' not found".
Attachments
Issue Links
- blocks
-
WFLY-9634 Enable MixedDomainDeploymentTest.testExplodedDeployment() for EAP 7.1.0
-
- Open
-
