Details
-
Type:
Bug
-
Status: Resolved (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: 1.0.0.GA
-
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0.Alpha1
-
Component/s: Events, Producers (Methods, Fields and Disposers)
-
Labels:None
-
Forum Reference:
-
Estimated Difficulty:High
-
Git Pull Request:
Description
Unneccessary restriction is currently present
Gliffy Diagrams
Issue Links
- is blocked by
-
WELD-8
Reduce reliance on invokeOnInstance by mapping against interfaces at deploy
-
- Closed
-
-
JBAS-8290
Implement solid SessionObjectReference
-
- Closed
-
- is related to
-
WELD-832
Remote EJBs can be resolved by name
-
- Resolved
-
-
WELD-746
Observer inheritance should take into consideration EJB semantics
-
- Resolved
-
-
CDITCK-158
TCK Test Failure: Expected exception: DeploymentFailure Not Thrown
-
- Closed
-
- relates to
-
WELD-401
Add getRemoteInterfaces() to EjbDescriptor
-
- Closed
-
Show 1 more links (1 relates to)
Yes, there is a subtlety in the spec. Remote interfaces are not bean types. However, producer, disposer and observer methods may be methods of a remote interface (rather than methods of a local interface). That's not a contradiction, since producers/disposers/observers are part of the "container view" of the bean, not part of the "client view". Frankly, if it were up to me, I would just drop the requirement that producers/disposers/observers be part of a business interface, but Sun didn't like this.