Details
-
Type:
Enhancement
-
Status: Closed (View Workflow)
-
Priority:
Major
-
Resolution: Done
-
Affects Version/s: 0.2
-
Fix Version/s: 0.3
-
Component/s: None
-
Labels:None
-
Estimated Difficulty:Low
Description
Tests that currently look like...
public class HelpDeskTests {
|
|
|
private BPMMixIn bpm;
|
private HTTPMixIn http;
|
|
|
@Test
|
public void testHelpDesk() throws Exception {
|
if (bpm.startTaskServer("Developer", "User")) {
|
try {
|
http.postResourceAndTestXML("http://localhost:18001/HelpDeskService", "/xml/soap-request.xml", "/xml/soap-response.xml");
|
boolean keepWorking = true;
|
while (keepWorking) {
|
keepWorking = bpm.completeTasksForUsers("Developer", "User");
|
}
|
} finally {
|
bpm.stopTaskServer();
|
}
|
}
|
}
|
}
|
Would end up looking like...
public class HelpDeskTests {
|
|
|
private BPMMixIn bpm;
|
private HTTPMixIn http;
|
|
|
@Test
|
public void testHelpDesk() throws Exception {
|
http.postResourceAndTestXML("http://localhost:18001/HelpDeskService", "/xml/soap-request.xml", "/xml/soap-response.xml");
|
boolean keepWorking = true;
|
while (keepWorking) {
|
keepWorking = bpm.completeTasksForUsers("Developer", "User");
|
}
|
}
|
}
|
Gliffy Diagrams
Activity
- All
- Comments
- Work Log
- History
- Activity
- Links Hierarchy
Actually ... I think maybe the way to support this type of thing might be to allow definition of MixIn factory methods on the test e.g.
@RunWith(SwitchYardRunner.class)
|
@SwitchYardTestCaseConfig(mixins = BPMMixIn.class)
|
public class BlahTest {
|
|
|
public BpmMixIn createBpmMixIn() {
|
BpmMixIn mixIn = new BpmMixIn();
|
mixIn.setPort(12123);
|
return mixIn;
|
}
|
|
|
// Test methods....
|
}
|
The SwitchYardRunner woud call these (if defined) when creating the MixIn instances.
Show
Tom Fennelly
added a comment - Actually ... I think maybe the way to support this type of thing might be to allow definition of MixIn factory methods on the test e.g.
@RunWith(SwitchYardRunner.class)
@SwitchYardTestCaseConfig(mixins = BPMMixIn.class)
public class BlahTest {
public BpmMixIn createBpmMixIn() {
BpmMixIn mixIn = new BpmMixIn();
mixIn.setPort(12123);
return mixIn;
}
// Test methods....
}
The SwitchYardRunner woud call these (if defined) when creating the MixIn instances.
Tom Fennelly
added a comment - Actually ... I think maybe the way to support this type of thing might be to allow definition of MixIn factory methods on the test e.g.
@RunWith(SwitchYardRunner.class)
@SwitchYardTestCaseConfig(mixins = BPMMixIn.class)
public class BlahTest {
public BpmMixIn createBpmMixIn() {
BpmMixIn mixIn = new BpmMixIn();
mixIn.setPort(12123);
return mixIn;
}
// Test methods....
}
The SwitchYardRunner woud call these (if defined) when creating the MixIn instances. Please join the discussion: http://community.jboss.org/thread/171619
Show
David Ward
added a comment - Please join the discussion: http://community.jboss.org/thread/171619
David Ward
added a comment - Please join the discussion: http://community.jboss.org/thread/171619 I think there are 2 issues here...
- Dragging in external/global configurations.
- The ability (within the test class) to have some control over how MixIns are constructed.
Lets say that this JIRA is about evolving the BPMMixIn to use the TestMixIn lifecycle methods + adding the ability to control MixIn construction via a factory method on the test class.
Show
Tom Fennelly
added a comment - I think there are 2 issues here...
Dragging in external/global configurations.
The ability (within the test class) to have some control over how MixIns are constructed.
Lets say that this JIRA is about evolving the BPMMixIn to use the TestMixIn lifecycle methods + adding the ability to control MixIn construction via a factory method on the test class.
Tom Fennelly
added a comment - I think there are 2 issues here...
Dragging in external/global configurations.
The ability (within the test class) to have some control over how MixIns are constructed.
Lets say that this JIRA is about evolving the BPMMixIn to use the TestMixIn lifecycle methods + adding the ability to control MixIn construction via a factory method on the test class. Dave... I'll take this JIRA. You guys are discussing the global config topic on the forums... there are other JIRAs for that.
Show
Tom Fennelly
added a comment - Dave... I'll take this JIRA. You guys are discussing the global config topic on the forums... there are other JIRAs for that.
Tom Fennelly
added a comment - Dave... I'll take this JIRA. You guys are discussing the global config topic on the forums... there are other JIRAs for that. pushed.
Show
David Ward
added a comment - pushed.
David Ward
added a comment - pushed. 
Might also be able to incorporate the completeTasksForUsers in the MixIn lifecycle.