Uploaded image for project: 'ShrinkWrap'
  1. ShrinkWrap
  2. SHRINKWRAP-239

Support the notion of shrinkwrap BundleArchive

        Details

        • Type: Feature Request
        • Status: Open (View Workflow)
        • Priority: Major
        • Resolution: Unresolved
        • Affects Version/s: None
        • Fix Version/s: None
        • Component/s: assembly
        • Labels:
          None

          Description

          Currently we create test bundles like this

          final JavaArchive archive = ShrinkWrap.create("test.jar", JavaArchive.class);
          archive.setManifest(new Asset()
          {
          public InputStream openStream()

          { OSGiManifestBuilder builder = OSGiManifestBuilder.newInstance(); builder.addBundleSymbolicName(archive.getName()); builder.addBundleManifestVersion(2); builder.addBundleActivator(SimpleActivator.class.getName()); // [TODO] generate a separate bundle the contains the test case builder.addExportPackages(OSGiEmbeddedFrameworkTestCase.class); builder.addImportPackages("org.jboss.arquillian.junit", "org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api", "org.jboss.shrinkwrap.api.spec"); builder.addImportPackages("javax.inject", "org.junit", "org.junit.runner"); return builder.openStream(); }

          });
          archive.addClasses(SimpleActivator.class, SimpleService.class);
          archive.addClasses(OSGiEmbeddedFrameworkTestCase.class);

          This should be done much easier via a BundleArchive

            Gliffy Diagrams

              Issue Links

              is blocked by

              Feature Request - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. SHRINKDESC-146 Ability to generate OSGi bundle headers

              • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
              • Open
              relates to

              Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JBOSGI-418 Fix Arquillian OSGiContainer callback

              • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
              • Resolved

                Activity

                Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
                Hide
                Permalink
                alrubinger Andrew Rubinger added a comment -

                Likely to be done implicitly via SHRINKWRAP-139 and an OSGi extension to SW

                Show
                alrubinger Andrew Rubinger added a comment - Likely to be done implicitly via SHRINKWRAP-139 and an OSGi extension to SW
                Hide
                Permalink
                thomas.diesler Thomas Diesler added a comment - - edited

                It must be possible to create a BundleArchive from within the OSGi Framework.
                i.e. A (test) Bundle can generate shrinkwrap bundles

                Show
                thomas.diesler Thomas Diesler added a comment - - edited It must be possible to create a BundleArchive from within the OSGi Framework. i.e. A (test) Bundle can generate shrinkwrap bundles
                Hide
                Permalink
                bosschaert David Bosschaert added a comment -

                Yes - Shrinkwrap should be usable from inside an OSGi framework. I've added a separate issue for that: SHRINKWRAP-242 and will start looking into it.

                Show
                bosschaert David Bosschaert added a comment - Yes - Shrinkwrap should be usable from inside an OSGi framework. I've added a separate issue for that: SHRINKWRAP-242 and will start looking into it.

                  People

                  • Assignee:
                    Unassigned
                    Reporter:
                    thomas.diesler Thomas Diesler
                  • Votes:
                    1 Vote for this issue
                    Watchers:
                    4 Start watching this issue

                    Dates

                    • Created:
                      Updated:

                      Development