Uploaded image for project: 'ShrinkWrap Descriptors'
  1. ShrinkWrap Descriptors
  2. SHRINKDESC-146

Ability to generate OSGi bundle headers

        Details

        • Type: Feature Request
        • Status: Open (View Workflow)
        • Priority: Major
        • Resolution: Unresolved
        • Affects Version/s: None
        • Fix Version/s: None
        • Component/s: None
        • Labels:
          None

          Description

          As we control the classpath generating an OSGi bundle header should be straightforward. Introducing an API to customize it is perhaps harder, but should be possible.

          May want to look at delegating to BND (http://www.aqute.biz/Code/Bnd).

            Gliffy Diagrams

              Issue Links

              blocks

              Feature Request - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. SHRINKWRAP-239 Support the notion of shrinkwrap BundleArchive

              • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
              • Open

              Feature Request - A new feature of the product, which has yet to be developed. ARQ-73 OSGi test container

              • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
              • Closed

              Task - A task that needs to be done. JBOSGI-382 Migrate shrinkwrap test bundles

              • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
              • Resolved
              duplicates

              Task - A task that needs to be done. SHRINKDESC-145 Provide a ManifestBuilder

              • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
              • Open

                Activity

                Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
                10 older comments
                Hide
                Permalink
                meetoblivion John Ament added a comment -

                rawr zombie jira ticket update looming.

                So, was thinking about this with regard to some fuse/servicemix stuff I'm playing with currently. Having a descriptor to do this makes the most sense. A BundleArchive would only support one thing (e.g. a JAR file w/ manifest), not necessarily a WAR file with that manifest. I don't think introducing a bundle archive fixes that stuff.

                I do think creating an OSGIDescriptor/OSGIManifest, and potentially a BlueprintDescriptor would help. While right now the descriptors are all reverse engineered based on XSDs, that doesn't mean we can't have one that's not based on an XSD (and as a result, directly coded).

                Show
                meetoblivion John Ament added a comment - rawr zombie jira ticket update looming. So, was thinking about this with regard to some fuse/servicemix stuff I'm playing with currently. Having a descriptor to do this makes the most sense. A BundleArchive would only support one thing (e.g. a JAR file w/ manifest), not necessarily a WAR file with that manifest. I don't think introducing a bundle archive fixes that stuff. I do think creating an OSGIDescriptor/OSGIManifest, and potentially a BlueprintDescriptor would help. While right now the descriptors are all reverse engineered based on XSDs, that doesn't mean we can't have one that's not based on an XSD (and as a result, directly coded).
                Hide
                Permalink
                alrubinger Andrew Rubinger added a comment -

                Looks like a duplicate, no?

                Show
                alrubinger Andrew Rubinger added a comment - Looks like a duplicate, no?
                Hide
                Permalink
                meetoblivion John Ament added a comment -

                Not sure that a ticket created 10 days ago is a duplicate of a ticket created 3 years ago, or if it's the other way, but you should account for all of these votes in the new ticket if you want to go forward with SHRINKDESC-145.

                Show
                meetoblivion John Ament added a comment - Not sure that a ticket created 10 days ago is a duplicate of a ticket created 3 years ago, or if it's the other way, but you should account for all of these votes in the new ticket if you want to go forward with SHRINKDESC-145 .
                Hide
                Permalink
                alrubinger Andrew Rubinger added a comment -

                The ticket confusion was due to a filing with the wrong project; I've since recategorized this correctly to SHRINKDESC instead of SHRINKWRAP. Either way, the real dependency on this feature is on a properly-built Descriptors project, which is pending resources to work on it.

                Show
                alrubinger Andrew Rubinger added a comment - The ticket confusion was due to a filing with the wrong project; I've since recategorized this correctly to SHRINKDESC instead of SHRINKWRAP. Either way, the real dependency on this feature is on a properly-built Descriptors project, which is pending resources to work on it.
                Hide
                Permalink
                rbattenfeld Ralf Battenfeld added a comment -

                Shall we create an descriptor for this? Reading the comment from John, an XSD is not available, right?

                Show
                rbattenfeld Ralf Battenfeld added a comment - Shall we create an descriptor for this? Reading the comment from John, an XSD is not available, right?

                  People

                  • Assignee:
                    Unassigned
                    Reporter:
                    pmuir Pete Muir
                  • Votes:
                    0 Vote for this issue
                    Watchers:
                    5 Start watching this issue

                    Dates

                    • Created:
                      Updated:

                      Development