Details

    • Type: Task Task
    • Status: Closed Closed
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.2.6-fuse-01-00
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar Issues:
      Show 9 results 

      Activity

      Hide
      deleted user
      added a comment -

      On a plus notem the test at least passes if the unrestricted export jars are installed in the jdk

      Running org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.wssec11.WSSecurity111Test
      **unrestrictedPoliciesInstalled = true
      Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 12.225 sec

      Results :

      Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

      Show
      deleted user
      added a comment - On a plus notem the test at least passes if the unrestricted export jars are installed in the jdk Running org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.wssec11.WSSecurity111Test **unrestrictedPoliciesInstalled = true Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 12.225 sec Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
      Hide
      deleted user
      added a comment -

      I'm attaching the log of a successful run on pdrhas4-64 using ibm jdk 1.6 (SR7) with the unrestricted export jars installed in the JDK.

      As this test works fine with the ibm 1.5 jdk, can we just release note thet there is a bug in the ibm 1.6 jdk when using the restricted jars? If so will I put code into the test to skip it when the restricted jars are installed for the ibm 1.6 jdk?

      Show
      deleted user
      added a comment - I'm attaching the log of a successful run on pdrhas4-64 using ibm jdk 1.6 (SR7) with the unrestricted export jars installed in the JDK. As this test works fine with the ibm 1.5 jdk, can we just release note thet there is a bug in the ibm 1.6 jdk when using the restricted jars? If so will I put code into the test to skip it when the restricted jars are installed for the ibm 1.6 jdk?
      Hide
      Aileen Cunningham
      added a comment -

      I think we can release notes and skip the tests in this case. If you have a test case for this you should log a bug against IBM JDK.

      Show
      Aileen Cunningham
      added a comment - I think we can release notes and skip the tests in this case. If you have a test case for this you should log a bug against IBM JDK.
      Hide
      deleted user
      added a comment -

      I'm going to try get teamcity green asap so putting in the test check now.
      I've created a jira to create a bug for IBM http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/SF-241

      Show
      deleted user
      added a comment - I'm going to try get teamcity green asap so putting in the test check now. I've created a jira to create a bug for IBM http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/SF-241
      Hide
      deleted user
      added a comment -

      3 tests remain failing due to fact jaxp-ri is not available in the kits because it is NOT something we want on any platform other
      than AIX. So a release note will have to be done for the AIX kits

      Show
      deleted user
      added a comment - 3 tests remain failing due to fact jaxp-ri is not available in the kits because it is NOT something we want on any platform other than AIX. So a release note will have to be done for the AIX kits

        People

        • Assignee:
          Unassigned
          Reporter:
          Aileen Cunningham
        • Votes:
          0 Vote for this issue
          Watchers:
          0 Start watching this issue

          Dates

          • Created:
            Updated:
            Resolved: