Details

    • Type: Task
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.2.6-fuse-01-00
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar Issues:
      Show 9 results 

      Gliffy Diagrams

        Activity

        Hide
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment -

        On a plus notem the test at least passes if the unrestricted export jars are installed in the jdk

        Running org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.wssec11.WSSecurity111Test
        **unrestrictedPoliciesInstalled = true
        Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 12.225 sec

        Results :

        Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

        Show
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment - On a plus notem the test at least passes if the unrestricted export jars are installed in the jdk Running org.apache.cxf.systest.ws.wssec11.WSSecurity111Test **unrestrictedPoliciesInstalled = true Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 12.225 sec Results : Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
        Hide
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment -

        I'm attaching the log of a successful run on pdrhas4-64 using ibm jdk 1.6 (SR7) with the unrestricted export jars installed in the JDK.

        As this test works fine with the ibm 1.5 jdk, can we just release note thet there is a bug in the ibm 1.6 jdk when using the restricted jars? If so will I put code into the test to skip it when the restricted jars are installed for the ibm 1.6 jdk?

        Show
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment - I'm attaching the log of a successful run on pdrhas4-64 using ibm jdk 1.6 (SR7) with the unrestricted export jars installed in the JDK. As this test works fine with the ibm 1.5 jdk, can we just release note thet there is a bug in the ibm 1.6 jdk when using the restricted jars? If so will I put code into the test to skip it when the restricted jars are installed for the ibm 1.6 jdk?
        Hide
        aileenc Aileen Cunningham added a comment -

        I think we can release notes and skip the tests in this case. If you have a test case for this you should log a bug against IBM JDK.

        Show
        aileenc Aileen Cunningham added a comment - I think we can release notes and skip the tests in this case. If you have a test case for this you should log a bug against IBM JDK.
        Hide
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment -

        I'm going to try get teamcity green asap so putting in the test check now.
        I've created a jira to create a bug for IBM http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/SF-241

        Show
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment - I'm going to try get teamcity green asap so putting in the test check now. I've created a jira to create a bug for IBM http://fusesource.com/issues/browse/SF-241
        Hide
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment -

        3 tests remain failing due to fact jaxp-ri is not available in the kits because it is NOT something we want on any platform other
        than AIX. So a release note will have to be done for the AIX kits

        Show
        eamdwyer deleted user added a comment - 3 tests remain failing due to fact jaxp-ri is not available in the kits because it is NOT something we want on any platform other than AIX. So a release note will have to be done for the AIX kits

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            aileenc Aileen Cunningham
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: