Uploaded image for project: 'Forge: MOP'
  1. Forge: MOP
  2. MOP-32

rationalise the command names a little

    Details

    • Type: Enhancement
    • Status: Open
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 1.0
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      we could do with an 'exec' which just executes the commands in a child process?

      now we have fork, maybe we don't need "execjar" and "exec"?

      names seem a bit inconsistent; we maybe need clearer names. e.g. fork, forkjar, forkrun maybe?

      run - run java class
      jar - run jar
      exec - run arbitrary commands

      then fork to fork a new jvm?

      • fork <args>
      • forkrun run a java class forked
      • forkjar run a jar forked

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Activity

          There are no comments yet on this issue.

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              jastrachan James Strachan
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:

                Development