Uploaded image for project: 'JGroups'
  1. JGroups
  2. JGRP-2086

FD_SOCK is keep trying to create a new socket to the killed server

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Major
    • 3.6.11, 4.0
    • 3.6.3
    • None

    Description

      In most cases FD_SOCK can detect a killed server immediately. But for unknown reason, FD_SOCK is keep trying to create a new socket to the killed server. As a consequence, installing a new cluster view is delayed until FD_ALL is triggered.

      m04_n007_server.log is showing the behaviour. There is 28 nodes (4 machines (m03, ..., m06) and 7 nodes (n001, ..., n007) on each) and all nodes on m03 are killed at the same time on 15:07:34,543. FD_SOCK is keep trying to connect to a killed node saying "socket address for m03_n001/clustered could not be fetched, retrying".

      [n007] 15:07:39,543 TRACE [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (Timer-8,shared=udp) m04_n007/clustered: broadcasting SUSPECT message (suspected_mbrs=[m03_n005/clustered, m03_n007/clustered])
      [n007] 15:07:39,544 TRACE [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (INT-20,shared=udp) m04_n007/clustered: received SUSPECT message from m04_n007/clustered: suspects=[m03_n005/clustered, m03_n007/clustered]
      [n007] 15:07:39,546 TRACE [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: socket address for m03_n001/clustered could not be fetched, retrying
      [n007] 15:07:40,546 DEBUG [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: ping_dest is m03_n001/clustered, pingable_mbrs=[m03_n001/clustered, m03_n002/clustered, m03_n003/clustered, m03_n004/clustered, m03_n006/clustered, m06_n001/clustered, m06_n002/clustered, m06_n003/clustered, m06_n004/clustered, m06_n005/clustered, m06_n006/clustered, m06_n007/clustered, m05_n001/clustered, m05_n002/clustered, m05_n003/clustered, m05_n004/clustered, m05_n005/clustered, m05_n006/clustered, m05_n007/clustered, m04_n001/clustered, m04_n002/clustered, m04_n003/clustered, m04_n004/clustered, m04_n005/clustered, m04_n006/clustered, m04_n007/clustered]
      [n007] 15:07:41,546 TRACE [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: socket address for m03_n001/clustered could not be fetched, retrying
      [n007] 15:07:42,546 DEBUG [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: ping_dest is m03_n001/clustered, pingable_mbrs=[m03_n001/clustered, m03_n002/clustered, m03_n003/clustered, m03_n004/clustered, m03_n006/clustered, m06_n001/clustered, m06_n002/clustered, m06_n003/clustered, m06_n004/clustered, m06_n005/clustered, m06_n006/clustered, m06_n007/clustered, m05_n001/clustered, m05_n002/clustered, m05_n003/clustered, m05_n004/clustered, m05_n005/clustered, m05_n006/clustered, m05_n007/clustered, m04_n001/clustered, m04_n002/clustered, m04_n003/clustered, m04_n004/clustered, m04_n005/clustered, m04_n006/clustered, m04_n007/clustered]
      [n007] 15:07:43,547 TRACE [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: socket address for m03_n001/clustered could not be fetched, retrying
      ...
      [n007] 15:10:53,700 DEBUG [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_ALL] (Timer-26,shared=udp) haven't received a heartbeat from m03_n005/clustered for 200059 ms, adding it to suspect list
      

      From the TRACE log, you can find an address cache of FD_SOCK has only 23 members.

      [n007] 14:40:50,471 TRACE [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: got cache from m03_n005/clustered: cache is {
      m04_n006/clustered=172.20.66.34:9945,
      m05_n005/clustered=172.20.66.35:9938,
      m06_n004/clustered=172.20.66.36:9931,
      m03_n007/clustered=172.20.66.33:9952,
      m05_n001/clustered=172.20.66.35:9910,
      m06_n005/clustered=172.20.66.36:9938,
      m05_n006/clustered=172.20.66.35:9945,
      m03_n005/clustered=172.20.66.33:9938,
      m05_n004/clustered=172.20.66.35:9931,
      m04_n003/clustered=172.20.66.34:9924,
      m04_n007/clustered=172.20.66.34:9952,
      m05_n002/clustered=172.20.66.35:9917,
      m05_n003/clustered=172.20.66.35:9924,
      m04_n004/clustered=172.20.66.34:9931,
      m06_n001/clustered=172.20.66.36:9910,
      m06_n007/clustered=172.20.66.36:9952,
      m04_n005/clustered=172.20.66.34:9938,
      m04_n001/clustered=172.20.66.34:9910,
      m05_n007/clustered=172.20.66.35:9952,
      m06_n002/clustered=172.20.66.36:9917,
      m06_n006/clustered=172.20.66.36:9945,
      m04_n002/clustered=172.20.66.34:9917,
      m06_n003/clustered=172.20.66.36:9924}
      

      While pingable_mbrs has all 28 members which is from the current available cluster view.

      [n007] 14:40:50,472 DEBUG [org.jgroups.protocols.FD_SOCK] (FD_SOCK pinger,m04_n007/clustered) m04_n007/clustered: ping_dest is m03_n005/clustered, pingable_mbrs=[
      m03_n005/clustered,
      m03_n007/clustered,
      m03_n001/clustered,
      m03_n002/clustered,
      m03_n003/clustered,
      m03_n004/clustered,
      m03_n006/clustered,
      m06_n001/clustered,
      m06_n002/clustered,
      m06_n003/clustered,
      m06_n004/clustered,
      m06_n005/clustered,
      m06_n006/clustered,
      m06_n007/clustered,
      m05_n001/clustered,
      m05_n002/clustered,
      m05_n003/clustered,
      m05_n004/clustered,
      m05_n005/clustered,
      m05_n006/clustered,
      m05_n007/clustered,
      m04_n001/clustered,
      m04_n002/clustered,
      m04_n003/clustered,
      m04_n004/clustered,
      m04_n005/clustered,
      m04_n006/clustered,
      m04_n007/clustered]
      

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              rhn-engineering-bban Bela Ban
              rhn-support-onagano Osamu Nagano
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: