Uploaded image for project: 'JBoss Transaction Manager'
  1. JBoss Transaction Manager
  2. JBTM-3110

JNDIBean CDI Deployment Failure

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Bug
    • Resolution: Done
    • Major
    • 5.9.3.Final
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      While testing Wildfly 16.0.0.Beta1 with an existing working (Wildfly 14.0.1) project we were unable to deploy the war as weld threw an exception.

      org.jboss.weld.exceptions.UnserializableDependencyException: WELD-001477: The bean Managed Bean [class co.cfly.oss.lerg.rateCenter.inventoryRequest.InventoryRequestView] with qualifiers [@Default @Any @Named] declares a passivating scope but has a(n) Interceptor [class com.arjuna.ats.jta.cdi.transactional.TransactionalInterceptorRequired intercepts @Transactional] with a non-passivation-capable dependency com.arjuna.ats.jta.cdi.JNDIBean@12e2cb9f
      	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.Validator.validateInterceptorDecoratorInjectionPointPassivationCapable(Validator.java:480)
      	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.Validator.validateInterceptors(Validator.java:225)
      	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.Validator.validateRIBean(Validator.java:175)
      	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.Validator.validateBean(Validator.java:526)
      	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentValidator$1.doWork(ConcurrentValidator.java:64)
      	at org.jboss.weld.bootstrap.ConcurrentValidator$1.doWork(ConcurrentValidator.java:62)
      	at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:62)
      	at org.jboss.weld.executor.IterativeWorkerTaskFactory$1.call(IterativeWorkerTaskFactory.java:55)
      	at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
      	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
      	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
      	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
      	at org.jboss.threads.JBossThread.run(JBossThread.java:485)
      

      I opened WFLY-11716 and had manovotn take a look. The issue is due to the JNDIBean not implementing PassivationCapable. He has also added a suggested fix in the issue.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              manovotn Matěj Novotný
              cody.lerum@gmail.com Cody Lerum
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: