Details

    • Type: Feature Request Feature Request
    • Status: Open Open (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: BlackTie, Resource Manager
    • Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
    • Labels:
      None
    • Similar Issues:
      Show 10 results 

      Description

      As requested by Juergen in the forums: http://community.jboss.org/message/522272#522272

        Activity

        Hide
        Tom Jenkinson
        added a comment -

        Michael Musgrove wrote:
        > EnterpriseDb is based on Postgresql and Red Hat has put its' weight
        > behind the former (its owns a stake in it).

        Show
        Tom Jenkinson
        added a comment - Michael Musgrove wrote: > EnterpriseDb is based on Postgresql and Red Hat has put its' weight > behind the former (its owns a stake in it).
        Hide
        Michael Musgrove
        added a comment -

        The C API (documented here http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/libpq.html) says nothing about XA support.
        The postgresql bug tracker contains http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-01/msg00236.php which is asking for such support but the response indicates that there are no plans to investigate. I've posted a follow up to see whether progress is feasible.

        Show
        Michael Musgrove
        added a comment - The C API (documented here http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/libpq.html ) says nothing about XA support. The postgresql bug tracker contains http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2010-01/msg00236.php which is asking for such support but the response indicates that there are no plans to investigate. I've posted a follow up to see whether progress is feasible.
        Hide
        Michael Musgrove
        added a comment -

        The response to my post on the pgsql forums looks promising (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-04/msg00197.php) but not in time for any 3.x release.

        Show
        Michael Musgrove
        added a comment - The response to my post on the pgsql forums looks promising ( http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-04/msg00197.php ) but not in time for any 3.x release.
        Hide
        Michael Musgrove
        added a comment -

        The postresql bug link for tracking this issue is:
        http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-04/msg00196.php

        There has been no movement since April so I am moving the JIRA out to a future release.

        Show
        Michael Musgrove
        added a comment - The postresql bug link for tracking this issue is: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2011-04/msg00196.php There has been no movement since April so I am moving the JIRA out to a future release.

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Tom Jenkinson
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated: