Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Closed Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Migrated to another ITS
    • Affects Version/s: EAP 6.0.0 ER 6_Beta2
    • Fix Version/s: EAP 6.1.0
    • Component/s: HornetQ
    • Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
    • Labels:
    • Affects:
      Release Notes
    • Similar Issues:
      Show 10 results 

      Description

      Currently there is no pre-defined way to deploy a JMS bridge (i.e. org.hornetq.jms.bridge.impl.JMSBridgeImpl) in AS7. In JBoss AS 6 and earlier you could deploy the bridge as an MBean or JBoss MC bean, but the current configuration schema in AS7 simply doesn't support it. The bridge is a nice feature so we need a way to deploy it.

      It doesn't make sense to add the JMS bridge to a <hornetq-server> because the bridge can operate independently of a local HornetQ server. It really needs its own subsystem.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Anne-Louise Tangring
          added a comment -

          This issue has been triaged and decided to not block/prevent/hold the EAP 6 release. To comply with Release Criteria stating that no issues with Critical or Blocker priority setting can be open for the release, this is changed to priority Major.

          Show
          Anne-Louise Tangring
          added a comment - This issue has been triaged and decided to not block/prevent/hold the EAP 6 release. To comply with Release Criteria stating that no issues with Critical or Blocker priority setting can be open for the release, this is changed to priority Major.
          Hide
          Dimitris Andreadis
          added a comment -

          This should really be scheduled for inclusion into EAP 6.1. I don't see the version in JIRA, though.

          Show
          Dimitris Andreadis
          added a comment - This should really be scheduled for inclusion into EAP 6.1. I don't see the version in JIRA, though.
          Hide
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment -

          This issue has been migrated to Bugzilla bug 900359. Please note that this JIRA issue has been closed as part of the migration and therefore you will need to check the Bugzilla issue to find the current status.

          Show
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment - This issue has been migrated to Bugzilla bug 900359 . Please note that this JIRA issue has been closed as part of the migration and therefore you will need to check the Bugzilla issue to find the current status.
          Hide
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment -

          Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from NEW to VERIFIED

          Show
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment - Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from NEW to VERIFIED
          Hide
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment -

          Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359

          Checked in EAP 6.1.0.DR4. JMS bridge can be configured there. Even when there are issues. Setting as verified.

          Show
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment - Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359 Checked in EAP 6.1.0.DR4. JMS bridge can be configured there. Even when there are issues. Setting as verified.
          Hide
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment -

          mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359

          Details inside vpn: https://post-office.corp.redhat.com/mailman/private/eap-pm-list/2013-July/msg00105.html

          Show
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment - mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359 Details inside vpn: https://post-office.corp.redhat.com/mailman/private/eap-pm-list/2013-July/msg00105.html
          Hide
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment -

          mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED

          Show
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment - mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED
          Hide
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment -

          mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED

          Show
          RH Bugzilla Integration
          added a comment - mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED

            People

            • Assignee:
              Jeff Mesnil
              Reporter:
              Miroslav Novak
            • Votes:
              2 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: