Details

    • Affects:
      Release Notes
    • Similar Issues:
      Show 10 results 

      Description

      Currently there is no pre-defined way to deploy a JMS bridge (i.e. org.hornetq.jms.bridge.impl.JMSBridgeImpl) in AS7. In JBoss AS 6 and earlier you could deploy the bridge as an MBean or JBoss MC bean, but the current configuration schema in AS7 simply doesn't support it. The bridge is a nice feature so we need a way to deploy it.

      It doesn't make sense to add the JMS bridge to a <hornetq-server> because the bridge can operate independently of a local HornetQ server. It really needs its own subsystem.

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            Anne-Louise Tangring added a comment -

            This issue has been triaged and decided to not block/prevent/hold the EAP 6 release. To comply with Release Criteria stating that no issues with Critical or Blocker priority setting can be open for the release, this is changed to priority Major.

            Show
            Anne-Louise Tangring added a comment - This issue has been triaged and decided to not block/prevent/hold the EAP 6 release. To comply with Release Criteria stating that no issues with Critical or Blocker priority setting can be open for the release, this is changed to priority Major.
            Hide
            Dimitris Andreadis added a comment -

            This should really be scheduled for inclusion into EAP 6.1. I don't see the version in JIRA, though.

            Show
            Dimitris Andreadis added a comment - This should really be scheduled for inclusion into EAP 6.1. I don't see the version in JIRA, though.
            Hide
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment -

            This issue has been migrated to Bugzilla bug 900359. Please note that this JIRA issue has been closed as part of the migration and therefore you will need to check the Bugzilla issue to find the current status.

            Show
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment - This issue has been migrated to Bugzilla bug 900359 . Please note that this JIRA issue has been closed as part of the migration and therefore you will need to check the Bugzilla issue to find the current status.
            Hide
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment -

            Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from NEW to VERIFIED

            Show
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment - Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from NEW to VERIFIED
            Hide
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment -

            Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359

            Checked in EAP 6.1.0.DR4. JMS bridge can be configured there. Even when there are issues. Setting as verified.

            Show
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment - Miroslav Novak <mnovak@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359 Checked in EAP 6.1.0.DR4. JMS bridge can be configured there. Even when there are issues. Setting as verified.
            Hide
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment -

            mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359

            Details inside vpn: https://post-office.corp.redhat.com/mailman/private/eap-pm-list/2013-July/msg00105.html

            Show
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment - mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> made a comment on bug 900359 Details inside vpn: https://post-office.corp.redhat.com/mailman/private/eap-pm-list/2013-July/msg00105.html
            Hide
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment -

            mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED

            Show
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment - mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED
            Hide
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment -

            mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED

            Show
            RH Bugzilla Integration added a comment - mark yarborough <myarboro@redhat.com> changed the Status of bug 900359 from VERIFIED to CLOSED

              People

              • Assignee:
                Jeff Mesnil
                Reporter:
                Miroslav Novak
              • Votes:
                2 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                4 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:

                  Development