Uploaded image for project: 'JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4 and 5'
  1. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 4 and 5
  2. JBPAPP-9341

EJBQL compiler creates different results with different JDKs

    XMLWordPrintable

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Critical
    • Resolution: Done
    • Affects Version/s: EAP_EWP 5.1.2
    • Fix Version/s: EAP_EWP 5.2.0
    • Component/s: EJB
    • Labels:
    • Environment:

      java version "1.7.0_b147-icedtea"
      OpenJDK Runtime Environment (fedora-2.1.fc16.1-x86_64)
      OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 22.0-b10, mixed mode)

    • Affects:
      Release Notes
    • Release Notes Text:
      Hide
      Because unlinked collections were used by the EJB-QL compiler to store join paths of processed queries, the order of individual parts of produced SQL queries was different with different versions of the Java Development Kit. While the queries produced identical results, the differences affected execution plan performance on some database systems. With this update, the unlinked collections have been replaced with linked ones. As a result, the produced SQL queries are now identical with different Java Development Kit versions and execution plan performance is no longer affected.
      Show
      Because unlinked collections were used by the EJB-QL compiler to store join paths of processed queries, the order of individual parts of produced SQL queries was different with different versions of the Java Development Kit. While the queries produced identical results, the differences affected execution plan performance on some database systems. With this update, the unlinked collections have been replaced with linked ones. As a result, the produced SQL queries are now identical with different Java Development Kit versions and execution plan performance is no longer affected.
    • Release Notes Docs Status:
      Documented as Resolved Issue
    • Docs QE Status:
      NEW

      Description

      junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<...pc.name = ?))) AND t[6_l_product.id=t5_l_product_productCategories_R.PRODUCT_ID AND t1_pc.id=t5_l_product_productCategories_R.PRODUCT_CATEGORY_ID AND t1_pc.subId=t5_l_product_productCategories_R.PRODUCT_CATEGORY_SUBID AND t4_l.product=t6_l_product.id AND t0_o.ORDER_NUMBER=t4_l.ORDER_NUMBER]> but was:<...pc.name = ?))) AND t[0_o.ORDER_NUMBER=t4_l.ORDER_NUMBER AND t6_l_product.id=t5_l_product_productCategories_R.PRODUCT_ID AND t1_pc.id=t5_l_product_productCategories_R.PRODUCT_CATEGORY_ID AND t1_pc.subId=t5_l_product_productCategories_R.PRODUCT_CATEGORY_SUBID AND t4_l.product=t6_l_product.id]>
      		 
      	at org.jboss.test.cmp2.commerce.QueryTest.testEJBQL(QueryTest.java:346)

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Attachments

            Issue Links

            blocks

            Task - A task that needs to be done. JBPAPP-8891 Certify EAP 5.1 with Java 7

            • Critical - An upcoming version that is affected by this issue cannot be released until it's addressed. A critical bug is one that crashes the application, causes loss of data or severe memory leak.
            • Closed
            is related to

            Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. AS7-4995 EJBQL compiler creates different results with different JDKs

            • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
            • Resolved
            relates to

            Sub-task - The sub-task of the issue JBAS-5497 JDK6: org.jboss.test.cmp2.commerce.QueryTest#testEJBQL

            • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
            • Closed

            Sub-task - The sub-task of the issue JBPAPP-9331 Fix tests depending on jboss-common-core: Java class

            • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
            • Closed

            Bug - A problem which impairs or prevents the functions of the product. JBAS-6962 org.jboss.test.cmp2.commerce.CompleteUnitTestCase failing with IBM JDK

            • Major - A request that should be considered seriously but is not a show stopper.
            • Closed

              Activity

                People

                • Assignee:
                  wolfc Carlo de Wolf
                  Reporter:
                  wolfc Carlo de Wolf
                  Writer:
                  Russell Dickenson
                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  5 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved: