Details

    • Release Notes Docs Status:
      Not Required
    • Similar Issues:
      Show 3 results 

      Description

      This was done before on HornetQ 2.1's branch, but we need to reapply the diffs now.

      If you go to this following branch:

      https://svn.jboss.org/repos/hornetq/branches/Branch_2_1_inactive_dont_use

      The following diff will be useful to complete this task:

      svn diff -r9658:9659

      and

      svn diff -r9662:9663

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Activity

          Hide
          atangrin Anne-Louise Tangring added a comment -

          If this can be fixed and does not require a full HQ rebuild, we should look into fixing it.

          Show
          atangrin Anne-Louise Tangring added a comment - If this can be fixed and does not require a full HQ rebuild, we should look into fixing it.
          Hide
          rrajesh Rajesh Rajasekaran added a comment -

          This was not fixed for EAP 5.1.1 Moving to 5.1.2 when HornetQ will be GA and we will have to provide a set of examples that works with EAP

          Show
          rrajesh Rajesh Rajasekaran added a comment - This was not fixed for EAP 5.1.1 Moving to 5.1.2 when HornetQ will be GA and we will have to provide a set of examples that works with EAP
          Hide
          rrajesh Rajesh Rajasekaran added a comment -

          Marking this resolved as JBPAPP-6659 is resolved which is for the same issue.

          Show
          rrajesh Rajesh Rajasekaran added a comment - Marking this resolved as JBPAPP-6659 is resolved which is for the same issue.
          Hide
          mnovak Miroslav Novak added a comment -

          Reopened to keep in sync with JBPAPP-6659

          Show
          mnovak Miroslav Novak added a comment - Reopened to keep in sync with JBPAPP-6659
          Hide
          rrajesh Rajesh Rajasekaran added a comment -

          I'm closing this as a duplicate of JBPAPP-6659 .
          It's just confusing to have too many JIRA's to track the same issue.

          Show
          rrajesh Rajesh Rajasekaran added a comment - I'm closing this as a duplicate of JBPAPP-6659 . It's just confusing to have too many JIRA's to track the same issue.

            People

            • Assignee:
              clebert.suconic Clebert Suconic
              Reporter:
              clebert.suconic Clebert Suconic
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development