Uploaded image for project: 'Application Server 3  4  5 and 6'
  1. Application Server 3 4 5 and 6
  2. JBAS-1181

Performance degredation with local IIOP calls

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    Description

      SourceForge Submitter: kevinconner .
      This is a duplicate of bug 525 in the JacORB database.
      It is being submitted here so that a patch may be
      applied to the JBoss patched version of JacORB. This
      issue is critical for the functionality of ArjunaTS
      within JBoss.

      http://www.jacorb.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=525

      We ran into a performance problem with jacorb, the
      following details the issue
      and the cause.

      Once of our tests showed that the performance of our
      application had dropped
      significantly once we enabled certain functionality in
      our code. I have managed
      to track this down to an issue with JacORB.

      The machine running our stress test showed a CPU usage
      of approx. 10%,
      drastically reducing our performance.

      The issue occurs when calls are forced to go via IIOP,
      in our case this was due
      to the existence of interceptors, and involve a second,
      internal, call over IIOP.

      The cause of this performance degredation was tracked
      down to the default
      enabling of Nagle on the IIOP Connections, the sequence
      of events were as follows.

      • first call over IIOP and flush
      • handling first call invokes second call over IIOP
        and flush
      • handling second call has to wait for Nagle to
        really send the data
      • response received to second call
      • response received to first call has to wait for Nagle.

      A workaround was attempted by disabling Nagle in the
      ServerIIOPConnection and
      ClientIIOPConnection. This brought performance back to
      a more acceptable level.

      The attached code demonstrates the issue.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            reverbel Francisco Reverbel (Inactive)
            sourceforge-user SourceForge legacy user (Inactive)
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            0 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: