Type: Feature Request
Status: Open (View Workflow)
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None
Similar Issues:Show 10 results
ERRAI-353 Compile time ErraiUI error reporting should be provided via validation of templates against @Templated widgets ERRAI-692 Better diagnostic for improper use of @Templated for list widgets ERRAI-423 Enable direct templating of e.g. UL and LI elements ERRAI-566 Annotations in generated code cause GWT to emit error messages at compile time ERRAI-604 Problem with i18n TranslateCommand for templates with multiple fragments ERRAI-597 IOC fails for inherited @Templated beans that are not marked as @Dependent ERRAI-678 Separate templated widgets from Errai IOC ERRAI-605 Update i18n support to include use-cases other than @Templated ERRAI-425 Resolution of @Templated with fully qualified path name fails ERRAI-718 Compile time enforcement of navigation to page roles
I already discussed about that with Jonathan Fuerth. Find below our IRC conversation:
<m4rt1n> is it possible to use @Templated with a template which is not available at compile-time but on run-time?
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: not at the moment, no
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: but it should be relatively easy to modify the client-side templating system to support that
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: what's your use case?
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: at the moment we have our own template engine together with servlets and jsps and are looking for alternatives to shift more to the client. our server supports multi-client functionality and we need highly customizable layouts
<m4rt1n> with our template enginge we can modify our output via xslt so at the moment it is very powerful
<m4rt1n> and we are looking how this could work with gwt
<m4rt1n> so i found errai ui which looks impressive
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: okay, I see. so you choose the templates based on, say, which user has signed in?
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: yes but only in rare cases. but mostly we have a single web application (installed on different machines) used by different customers and all want their own layout
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: okay, I see. so this could still be solved at compile time if that's what you wanted. but I understand the desire to add new templates at runtime
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: but if we want solve this at compile time we would have to compile different front-end versions isn't it?
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: with ErraiUI in its current form, yes that's the only option
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: but another option would be to compile multiple sets of templates (still in GWT resource bundles) and provide a way of choosing one at runtime
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: it's just a thought. since we don't have any feature to match your use case, we can explore the possible alternatives.
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: right but sometimes our customers are doing their layout on there own so we are not involved
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: ah, interesting. good point!
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: of course, you'd be giving up the compile-time checking that guarantees all @DataField references actually refer to something in the template
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: yep
<jfuerth> but yeah, it shouldn't be a giant change to the existing framework code to enable download-at-runtime templates
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: we are in an orientation phase since 1 1/2 years. we did a prototype in 2011 with vanilla gwt (but without templating) and at the moment i would tend to use vaadin
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: what is it about vaadin that appeals to you?
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: you mean what i like about vaadin?
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: it runs on the server and they have custom layouts
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: https://vaadin.com/book/-/page/layout.customlayout.html which makes it easy to change layout on the fly
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: I see. At least superficially, that looks a lot like ErraiUI (except that you've got some logic on the server that's selecting the layout)
<jfuerth> it does say in the doc that "The client-side engine of Vaadin will replace contents of the location elements with the components."
<jfuerth> so that part must be very similar
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: maybe you can discuss this with the rest of the errai ui team?
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: yeah, we'll definitely give it some thought. can you file a Jira so we don't forget?
<m4rt1n> jfuerth: i will do that
<jfuerth> m4rt1n: cool
So here we are