Match.getObjects() should reflect the patterns' order

if Match.getObjects() is called on a rule with LHS A() B() C(),
the resulting list will have the matching objects in reversed order

• that is, [c, b, a] - making it more difficult to analyze it.
  The object's position in the list should reflect the LHS.

The order should be preserved even when subnetworks are present.
For example, A() not B() C() should then result in the list [a, *, c ]