Uploaded image for project: 'CDI Specification Issues'
  1. CDI Specification Issues
  2. CDI-319

Reword part of the @Vetoed section

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Clarification
    • Resolution: Done
    • Major
    • 1.1.FD
    • None
    • None
    • None

    Description

      I think the current wording of 3.13 "Vetoing types" is misleading now. E.g. @Vetoed on annotation (qualifier, stereotype) has no effect. Also the spec wording should be synced with @Vetoed javadoc.

      To sum it up: @Vetoed affects classes, interfaces, enums.

      • class -> no container lifecycle event (PAT), no bean or observer methods defined by the class will be installed
      • interface, enum -> no container lifecycle event (PAT)

      I suggest something similar:

      Any Java class, interface, enum or package may be prevented from being considered by CDI by adding the @Vetoed annotation.
      In particular,

      • any beans or observer methods defined by a class annotated with @Vetoed will not be installed
      • no container lifecycle events are fired for classes, interfaces or enums annotated with @Vetoed
      • when @Vetoed placed on package, all classes, interfaces or enums in the package are prevented from being considered by CDI

      The rest is ok.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            pmuiratbleepbleep Pete Muir (Inactive)
            mkouba@redhat.com Martin Kouba
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: