Details
-
Bug
-
Resolution: Done
-
Major
-
1.1.PRD
-
None
-
None
Description
The spec states in 6.6.4. "Validation of passivation capable beans and dependencies":
If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean, has a decorator or interceptor which is not a
passivation capable dependency, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a deployment problem.
WRT CDI-136 "If a bean which declares a passivating scope type, or any stateful session bean," should be replaced with: "If a managed bean or stateful session bean which declares a passivating scope".
I'm not sure about the wording "has a decorator or interceptor which is not a passivation capable dependency" because the wording in section 6.6.1. "Passivation capable beans" is "interceptors and decorators of the bean are passivation capable" (passivation capable dependency vs passivation capable).
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
CDI-136 Assumption all @Stateful beans should be passivation capable
- Closed